The main objective is to determine the influence of TOE contextual factors on e-commerce adoption and usage. The outcome
section explores explicitly the connections between technological, organizational, and environmental elements and the
adoption of e-commerce, which addresses this purpose. Most of the TOE components associated with this purpose are
technological and environmental (e.g., TR, AC, GS). The results reveal a positive association between technological readiness
and the utilization of e-commerce. However, feelings of discomfort and apprehension can hinder technology adoption
preparation, as individuals may express both positive and negative sentiments regarding it. As a result of its significance,
the discipline of computer science needs to concentrate on technology readiness for Pakistani SMEs to adopt technological
trends (such as the UOEC). Utilizing technology to enhance performance and drive innovation is a prerequisite for digital
technology readiness to facilitate digital transformation [33][41][42]. Adoption costs, an organizational element, have a
negative impact on the UOEC, whereas GS, an environmental factor, has a favorable impact. The TOE framework has also been
widely applied as a theory to examine how well SMEs embrace new technologies [43]. Additionally, TOE has established itself
as the preferred framework for analyzing technology adoption [44].
The second objective investigates the extent to which e-commerce utilization acts as a mediator in the connection
between TOE characteristics and the innovative performance of SMEs. The discussion of how UOEC mediates the relationship
between adoption costs and innovative performance in the results section directly addresses this purpose and has full
mediation. AC is essential for the adoption of any new technology. Similarly, To create a better framework for understanding
and forecasting technological adoption and/or the intention to use technology (such as intelligence conversational agents and
chatbots-AI technology) among SMEs, incorporates perceived technology security and UTUAT constructs into the TOE framework.
Findings on business intelligence systems and e-business adoption among SMEs also show adoption costs to be negligible
[45][46]. The UOEC has complementary partial mediation between the TOE factors (i.e. technological (TR), organizational (such
as AC)) and innovative performance in the context of SMEs of Pakistan.
The third objective explores how the innovation capability and e-commerce adoption of SMEs may be impacted by the
ECMC. According to [47] the development of resources and marketing abilities that support businesses performance in a
developing market is important. Similarly, social media marketing communication capability was found to have a significantly
positive relationship only with customer relationship performance [48]. Similar to this, suggested that marketing
competencies in the form of mixed decisions about new products will work to boost the favorable benefits of orientation on
innovation performance. The moderating impact of market capacities on the use of e-commerce and innovative performance is
examined in this study. The conclusion regarding this relationship is dismissed. There is no moderating connection between
the utilization of e-commerce and the innovative performance of SMEs.
In the realm of computer science, this research holds significant importance as it highlights the connection between
various elements of TOE and the UOEC. These elements encompass technological aspects (like TR and UOEC), organizational
factors (including AC and UOEC), and environmental factors (such as GS and UOEC), all of which collectively impact the
innovative performance of SMEs. Additionally, the study considers the moderating influence of market capability in this
relationship. This is important to computer science because of the following reasons:
Computer science is a key component of the digital transformation, SMEs can use e-commerce to enhance their
performance in terms of innovation. Many companies use their website to revamp internal computer science department systems
and reconsider administrative organizational techniques. One of the goals of SMEs is to increase turnover, market share, and
sales. Other goals of SMEs include improving interactions with internal partners (processes/organization), improving
interactions with external partners (customers/suppliers), and improving interactions with customers.
[1] M. A. Qureshi, M. Akbar, A. Akbar, and P. Poulova, “Do ESG Endeavors Assist Firms in Achieving Superior Financial Performance? A Case of 100 Best Corporate Citizens,” SAGE Open, vol. 11, no. 2, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1177/21582440211021598/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_21582440211021598-FIG2.JPEG.
[2] Y. R. AKBAR, “The role of the government in strategic management and orientation of entrepreneurship to small medium enterprise business performance,” Asian J. Adv. Res., pp. 27–36, 2021.
[3] I. Balen, J., Nojeem, L., Bitala, W., Junta, U., & Browndi, “Essential Determinants for Assessing the Strategic Agility Framework in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs),” Eur. J. Sci. Appl. Sci., vol. 10, pp. 2124–2129, 2023.
[4] J. E. Chung, S. G. Oh, and H. C. Moon, “What drives SMEs to adopt smart technologies in Korea? Focusing on technological factors,” Technol. Soc., vol. 71, p. 102109, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2022.102109.
[5] H. Kim, “Performance from building smart factories of small- and medium-sized enterprises: the moderating effects of product complexity and company size,” Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag., vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 1497–1520, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1108/IJOPM-10-2021-0654/FULL/XML.
[6] T. Xuan Soan Street, T. Thuan Tay Ward, H. Chi Minh, X. Truong NGUYEN, and Q. Khai LUU, “Factors Affecting Adoption of Industry 4.0 by Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Case in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam,” J. Asian Financ. Econ. Bus., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 255–264, 2020, doi: 10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VOL7.NO6.255.
[7] S. H. Jin and S. O. Choi, “The Effect of Innovation Capability on Business Performance: A Focus on IT and Business Service Companies,” Sustain. 2019, Vol. 11, Page 5246, vol. 11, no. 19, p. 5246, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.3390/SU11195246.
[8] A. Bousdekis, D. Apostolou, and G. Mentzas, “Predictive Maintenance in the 4th Industrial Revolution: Benefits, Business Opportunities, and Managerial Implications,” IEEE Eng. Manag. Rev., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 57–62, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1109/EMR.2019.2958037.
[9] D. Horváth and R. Z. Szabó, “Driving forces and barriers of Industry 4.0: Do multinational and small and medium-sized companies have equal opportunities?,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 146, pp. 119–132, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2019.05.021.
[10] “Challenge Fund for SMEs,” 2022.
[11] M. Mustafa, “The Development of Corporate Entrepreneurship among Emerging Economy SMEs: Insights from Both Institutional and Contingency Theory,” Entrep. Res. J., vol. 0, no. 0, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1515/ERJ-2022-0048.
[12] E. Yadegaridehkordi et al., “The impact of big data on firm performance in hotel industry,” Electron. Commer. Res. Appl., vol. 40, p. 100921, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.ELERAP.2019.100921.
[13] M. Heredia-Calzado and A. Duréndez, “The influence of knowledge management and professionalization on the use of ERP systems and its effect on the competitive advantages of SMEs,” Enterp. Inf. Syst., vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1245–1274, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1080/17517575.2019.1640393.
[14] S. Hassan, M. U., Naz, F., & Ahmed, “Testing Structuration Theory in E-Government System Assimilation: Mediating Role of Pakistani Cotton Ginners,” Absorpt. Capacit. Bus. Econ. Rev., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 29–56, 2021.
[15] H. Houache, N. Hayani, B. A. Rahim, and A. Shah, “Analysis of models for e-commerce adoption factors in developing countries,” Int. J. Perceptive Cogn. Comput., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 72–80, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.31436/IJPCC.V5I2.100.
[16] J. Osakwe, I. N. Waiganjo, T. Tarzoor, G. Iyawa, and M. Ujakpa, “Determinants of Information Systems Resources for Business Organisations’ Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View Approach,” 2022 IST-Africa Conf. IST-Africa 2022, 2022, doi: 10.23919/IST-AFRICA56635.2022.9845670.
[17] H. ZARROUK, M. SHERIF, L. GALLOWAY, and T. EL GHAK, “Entrepreneurial Orientation, Access to Financial Resources and SMEs’ Business Performance: The Case of the United Arab Emirates,” J. Asian Financ. Econ. Bus., vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 465–474, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VOL7.NO12.465.
[18] S. Zulu-Chisanga, M. Chabala, and B. Mandawa-Bray, “The differential effects of government support, inter-firm collaboration and firm resources on SME performance in a developing economy,” J. Entrep. Emerg. Econ., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 175–195, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1108/JEEE-07-2019-0105/FULL/XML.
[19] F. Teng, X., Wu, Z., & Yang, “Research on the relationship between digital transformation and performance of SMEs,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 10, 2022.
[20] S. Rahi, M. M. Othman Mansour, M. Alghizzawi, and F. M. Alnaser, “Integration of UTAUT model in internet banking adoption context: The mediating role of performance expectancy and effort expectancy,” J. Res. Interact. Mark., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 411–435, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1108/JRIM-02-2018-0032/FULL/XML.
[21] A. Caputo, S. Pizzi, M. M. Pellegrini, and M. Dabić, “Digitalization and business models: Where are we going? A science map of the field,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 123, pp. 489–501, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2020.09.053.
[22] H. Taherdoost, “E-Business Adoption,” pp. 291–317, 2023, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-39626-7_12.
[23] A. N. Salmizi, N. N. Abd Aziz, and S. F. Hazudin, “Factors Affecting E-Commerce Adoption: A Conceptual Model and Research Propositions,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 12, no. 11, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.6007/IJARBSS/V12-I11/15334.
[24] Y. Zhang, X., & Han, “Impact of Covid-19 on small and medium sized cross-border e-commerce enterprises and suggestions,” J. Fro. Eng. Technol, vol. 23, no. 2, 2020.
[25] M. A. Nazir, M. A. Roomi, M. Arsalan, N. Muhammad, and A. Roomi, “Barriers to Adopting Electronic Commerce for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in Emerging Economies,” EMAJ Emerg. Mark. J., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 43–55, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.5195/emaj.2020.203.
[26] C. B. Hossain, M. B., Wicaksono, T., Nor, K. M., Dunay, A., & Illes, “E-commerce adoption of small and medium-sized enterprises during COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from South Asian Countries,” J. Asian Financ. Econ. Bus., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 291–298, 2022.
[27] E. D. Lestari, N. A. Hamid, N. Rizkalla, P. Purnamaningsih, and S. B. T. Urus, “The Effect of Financial Literacy, Cost of Technology Adoption, Technology Perceived Usefulness, and Government Support on MSMEs’ Business Resilience,” GATR Glob. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. Rev., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 132–147, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.35609/GJBSSR.2022.10.3(3).
[28] V. Domun and H. Bheemul, “Factors affecting the adoption of cloud computing among SMEs in mauritius,” Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput., vol. 862, pp. 333–336, 2019, doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-3329-3_31/COVER.
[29] B. Wang, “Expectancy, perceived benefit and perceived cost of new technology : scale development in the context of Chinese textile and apparel firm mangers,” May 2019, doi: 10.32469/10355/75044.
[30] Y. Qiu, T. Chen, J. Cai, and J. Yang, “The Impact of Government Behavior on the Development of Cross-Border E-Commerce B2B Export Trading Enterprises Based on Evolutionary Game in the Context of ‘Dual-Cycle’ Policy,” J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2022, Vol. 17, Pages 1741-1768, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1741–1768, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.3390/JTAER17040088.
[31] S. A. Qalati, L. W. Yuan, M. A. S. Khan, and F. Anwar, “A mediated model on the adoption of social media and SMEs’ performance in developing countries,” Technol. Soc., vol. 64, p. 101513, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2020.101513.
[32] A. M. A. Ausat and T. Peirisal, “Determinants of E-commerce Adoption on Business Performance: A Study of MSMEs in Malang City, Indonesia,” J. Optimasi Sist. Ind., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 104–114, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.25077/JOSI.V20.N2.P104-114.2021.
[33] D. T. Parra, L. H. Talero-Sarmiento, J. D. Ortiz, and C. D. Guerrero, “Technology readiness for IoT adoption in Colombian SMEs,” Iber. Conf. Inf. Syst. Technol. Cist., Jun. 2021, doi: 10.23919/CISTI52073.2021.9476499.
[34] K. S. Al-Omoush, V. Simón-Moya, and J. Sendra-García, “The impact of social capital and collaborative knowledge creation on e-business proactiveness and organizational agility in responding to the COVID-19 crisis,” J. Innov. Knowl., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 279–288, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.JIK.2020.10.002.
[35] I. Ghosal, B. Prasad, and M. P. Behera, “Delineating the Exchange Environment of Handicraft Industry from Market Space to Marketplace: An Inclusive Map for RURBAN Development,” https://doi.org/10.1177/0971890720959533, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 133–148, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1177/0971890720959533.
[36] A. Khattak, “Hegemony of Digital Platforms, Innovation Culture, and E-Commerce Marketing Capabilities: The Innovation Performance Perspective,” Sustain. 2022, Vol. 14, Page 463, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 463, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/SU14010463.
[37] M. Sarstedt, C. M. Ringle, and J. F. Hair, “Treating unobserved heterogeneity in PLS-SEM: A multi-method approach,” Partial Least Squares Path Model. Basic Concepts, Methodol. Issues Appl., p. 197, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_9/COVER.
[38] M. Sarstedt, C. M. Ringle, and J. F. Hair, “Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling,” Handb. Mark. Res., pp. 587–632, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15/COVER.
[39] J. F. Hair, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, “Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance,” Long Range Plann., vol. 46, no. 1–2, pp. 1–12, Feb. 2013, doi: 10.1016/J.LRP.2013.01.001.
[40] C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, “Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics,” J. Mark. Res., vol. 18, no. 3, p. 382, Aug. 1981, doi: 10.2307/3150980.
[41] V. Jafari-Sadeghi, A. Garcia-Perez, E. Candelo, and J. Couturier, “Exploring the impact of digital transformation on technology entrepreneurship and technological market expansion: The role of technology readiness, exploration and exploitation,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 124, pp. 100–111, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2020.11.020.
[42] C. D. Parra-Sánchez, D. T., Talero-Sarmiento, L. H., & Guerrero, “Assessment of ICT policies for digital transformation in Colombia: technology readiness for IoT adoption in SMEs in the trading sector,” Digit. Policy, Regul. Gov., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 412–431.
[43] R. El-Haddadeh, “Digital Innovation Dynamics Influence on Organisational Adoption: The Case of Cloud Computing Services,” Inf. Syst. Front., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 985–999, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1007/S10796-019-09912-2/TABLES/6.
[44] E. D. Sugandini, D., Effendi, M. I., Istanto, Y., Arundati, R., & Rahmawati, “Technology-organization-environment model and technology acceptance model in adoption of social media marketing on SMEs tourism,” J. Environ. Manag. Tour., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 878–885, 2019.
[45] D. Hu, X., Ocloo, C. E., Akaba, S., & Worwui-Brown, “Effects of business to business e-commerce adoption on competitive advantage of small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises - Economics and Sociology.” Accessed: Oct. 30, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.economics-sociology.eu/?642,en_effects-of-business-to-business-e-commerce-adoption-on-competitive-advantage-of-small-and-medium-sized-manufacturing-enterprises
[46] S. Dahbi and C. Benmoussa, “What Hinder SMEs from Adopting E-commerce? A Multiple Case Analysis,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 158, pp. 811–818, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.PROCS.2019.09.118.
[47] H. Khan, F. Mavondo, and N. Zahoor, “Integration of outside-in and inside-out entrepreneurial marketing capabilities, marketing agility and resources for entrepreneurial firm performance,” Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res., vol. ahead-of-print, no. ahead-of-print, 2022, doi: 10.1108/IJEBR-02-2022-0193/FULL/XML.
[48] P. Tarsakoo and P. Charoensukmongkol, “Dimensions of social media marketing capabilities and their contribution to business performance of firms in Thailand,” J. Asia Bus. Stud., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 441–461, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1108/JABS-07-2018-0204/FULL/XML.
[49] M. Shahzad, Y. Qu, A. U. Zafar, S. U. Rehman, and T. Islam, “Exploring the influence of knowledge management process on corporate sustainable performance through green innovation,” J. Knowl. Manag., vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 2079–2106, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1108/JKM-11-2019-0624/FULL/XML.
[50] Y. Hussain, K. Abbass, M. Usman, M. Rehan, and M. Asif, “Exploring the mediating role of environmental strategy, green innovations, and transformational leadership: the impact of corporate social responsibility on environmental performance,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022 2951, vol. 29, no. 51, pp. 76864–76880, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1007/S11356-022-20922-7.