Assessing Salt Stress Responses in Cotton Genotypes: Insights for Breeding Initiatives
Keywords:
Salinity, Genotypes, Physiological Assessments, Cotton, PotassiumAbstract
The growth and production of cotton on a global scale are significantly threatened by salinity stress. This study investigates the salt stress responses of eight cotton genotypes, focusing on their physiological and biochemical characteristics under varying salinity levels. Conducted at the Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, University of Punjab, Lahore, the research employed a triple completely randomized design with two salinity levels and a control group. Genotypes were selected based on production potential and adaptability to Pakistan's cotton-growing regions. Physiological assessments included sodium (Na+) and potassium (K+) ion concentrations, while biochemical parameters encompassed antioxidant enzyme activities, soluble protein levels, and proline content. Statistical analysis revealed significant variations among genotypes and salinity levels, indicating genetic diversity and diverse reactions to salt stress. Genotypes displayed altered growth metrics, ion homeostasis, and K+/Na+ ratios under salt stress, highlighting their sensitivity and potential breeding value. However, it is crucial to thoroughly examine all associations between genotype and environment. The research listed above provide significant insights into the responses of cotton seedlings to salt stress.
References
X. W. G. Z. Y Liu, “Research on evaluation method of salt tolerance at seedling stage in cotton,” Mod. Agric Sci Technol, vol. 7, p. 11,16, 2011.
H. P. J. Z. WH Long, “Screening of Brassica napus for salinity tolerance at germination stage,” Chin J Oil Crop Sci, vol. 35, pp. 271–275, 2013.
L. Zhang, H. Ma, T. Chen, J. Pen, S. Yu, and X. Zhaoe, “Morphological and physiological responses of cotton (gossypium hirsutum l.) plants to salinity,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 11, Nov. 2014, doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0112807.
L. Zeng, M. C. Shannon, and C. M. Grieve, “Evaluation of salt tolerance in rice genotypes by multiple agronomic parameters,” Euphytica, vol. 127, no. 2, pp. 235–245, 2002, doi: 10.1023/a:1020262932277.
H. Wu et al., “An effective screening method and a reliable screening trait for salt tolerance of Brassica napus at the germination stage,” Front Plant Sci, vol. 10, p. 530, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00530.
W. Wang, B. Vinocur, and A. Altman, “Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance,” Planta, vol. 218, no. 1, pp. 1–4, Nov. 2003, doi: 10.1007/s00425-003-1105-5.
M. Tester and R. Davenport, “Na+ tolerance and Na+ transport in higher plants,” Ann Bot, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 503–527, Apr. 2003, doi: 10.1093/aob/mcg058.
D. Suriya-Arunroj, N. Supapoj, T. Toojinda, and A. Vanavichit, “Relative leaf water content as an efficient method for evaluating rice cultivars for tolerance to salt stress,” ScienceAsia, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 411–415, 2004, doi: 10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2004.30.411.
K. Sorkheh, B. Shiran, V. Rouhi, M. Khodambashi, and A. Sofo, “Salt stress induction of some key antioxidant enzymes and metabolites in eight Iranian wild almond species,” Acta Physiol Plant, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 203–213, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s11738-011-0819-4.
D. P. Singh and R. K. Sarkar, “Distinction and characterisation of salinity tolerant and sensitive rice cultivars as probed by the chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics and growth parameters,” Funct Plant Biol, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 727–736, 2014, doi: 10.1071/fp13229.
T. R. Sinclair and M. M. Ludlow, “Influence of soil water supply on the plant water balance of four tropical grain legumes,” Funct Plant Biol, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 329–341, 1986, doi: 10.1071/pp9860329.
S. M. Higbie et al., “Physiological Response to Salt (NaCl) Stress in Selected Cultivated Tetraploid Cottons,” Int. J. Agron., vol. 2010, pp. 1–12, 2010, doi: 10.1155/2010/643475.
K. Hessini et al., “Interactive effects of salinity and nitrogen forms on plant growth, photosynthesis and osmotic adjustment in maize,” Plant Physiol Biochem, vol. 139, pp. 171–178, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.03.005.
G. Shi, Q. Cai, C. Liu, and L. Wu, “Silicon alleviates cadmium toxicity in peanut plants in relation to cadmium distribution and stimulation of antioxidative enzymes,” Plant Growth Regul, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 45–52, May 2010, doi: 10.1007/s10725-010-9447-z.
Z. Sehar, A. Masood, and N. A. Khan, “Nitric oxide reverses glucose-mediated photosynthetic repression in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under salt stress,” Env. Exp Bot, vol. 161, pp. 277–289, May 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.01.010.
B. Sarabi et al., “Stomatal and non-stomatal limitations are responsible in down-regulation of photosynthesis in melon plants grown under the saline condition: application of carbon isotope discrimination as a reliable proxy,” Plant Physiol Biochem, vol. 141, pp. 1–9, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.05.010.
B. Sarabi, S. Bolandnazar, N. Ghaderi, and J. Ghashghaie, “Genotypic differences in physiological and biochemical responses to salinity stress in melon (Cucumis melo L.) plants: prospects for selection of salt tolerant landraces,” Plant Physiol Biochem, vol. 119, pp. 294–311, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.09.006.
E. Sánchez-Rodríguez et al., “Genotypic differences in some physiological parameters symptomatic for oxidative stress under moderate drought in tomato plants,” Plant Sci, vol. 178, no. 1, pp. 30–40, Jan. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.10.001.
A. M. Ismail and T. Horie, “Genomics, physiology, and molecular breeding approaches for improving salt tolerance,” Annu Rev Plant Biol, vol. 68, pp. 405–434, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042916-040936.
N. Sade, M. Del Mar Rubio-Wilhelmi, K. Umnajkitikorn, and E. Blumwald, “Stress-induced senescence and plant tolerance to abiotic stress,” J Exp Bot, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 845–853, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx235.
Z. Rahneshan, F. Nasibi, and A. A. Moghadam, “Effects of salinity stress on some growth, physiological, biochemical parameters and nutrients in two pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) rootstocks,” J Plant Interact, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 73–82, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1080/17429145.2018.1424355.
J. Li, L. Pu, M. Han, M. Zhu, R. Zhang, and Y. Xiang, “Soil salinization research in China: advances and prospects,” J Geogr Sci, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 943–960, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s11442-014-1130-2.
Q. Liu, R. Liu, Y. Ma, and J. Song, “Physiological and molecular evidence for Na+ and cl− exclusion in the roots of two Suaeda salsa populations,” Aquat Bot, vol. 146, pp. 1–7, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2018.01.001.
Z. Peng et al., “Integration of proteomic and transcriptomic profiles reveals multiple levels of genetic regulation of salt tolerance in cotton,” BMC Plant Biol, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 128, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1186/s12870-018-1350-1.
Z. Peng et al., “Comprehensive analysis of differentially expressed genes and transcriptional regulation induced by salt stress in two contrasting cotton genotypes,” BMC Genomics, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 760, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-760.
C. Penella, S. G. Nebauer, A. Quiñones, A. San Bautista, S. López-Galarza, and A. Calatayud, “Some rootstocks improve pepper tolerance to mild salinity through ionic regulation,” Plant Sci, vol. 230, pp. 12–22, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.10.007.
D. A. Meloni, M. A. Oliva, H. A. Ruiz, and C. A. Martinez, “Contribution of proline and inorganic solutes to osmotic adjustment in cotton under salt stress,” J Plant Nutr, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 599–612, 2001, doi: 10.1081/pln-100104983.
N. Nounjan and P. Theerakulpisut, “Effects of exogenous proline and trehalose on physiological responses in rice seedlings during salt-stress and after recovery,” Plant Soil Env., vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 309–315, 2012, doi: 10.17221/762/2011-pse.
R. Munns and M. Tester, “Mechanisms of salinity tolerance,” Annu Rev Plant Biol, vol. 59, pp. 651–681, 2008, doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911.
R. Munns, R. A. James, M. Gilliham, T. J. Flowers, and T. D. Colmer, “Tissue tolerance: an essential but elusive trait for salt-tolerant crops,” Funct Plant Biol, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 1103–1113, 2016, doi: 10.1071/fp16187.
