Historical Development of Urban Planning Theory: Review and Comparison of Theories in Urban Planning

Muhammad Umar  zulfiqar; Maria Kausar

Authors

Muhammad Umar zulfiqar Department of City & Regional Planning, University of Engineering and Technology Lahore, Pakistan
Maria Kausar Department of City & Regional Planning, University of Engineering and Technology Lahore, Pakistan

Keywords:

History of Urban planning, Modals of planning, Industrial Revolution

Abstract

Discipline of urban planning only developed around a century back with the first academic school at the University of Liverpool in 1909. However, the theory of this discipline is relatively older and might date to varying timelines around various parts of the world. However, modern urban planning discipline has got birth in the US and Western Europe. Early development in the theory of urban planning develops challenges for the cities. In response to such challenges, the planning approaches seem to adapt to the needs of emerging regimes evident from the high-scale urban renovation of Paris by Haussmann. This is called the Progressive Model of Planning wherein planners of the time struggled to deal with the challenges imparted by the Industrial Revolution through scientific and engineering-based knowledge. Early urban planning efforts were mostly anarchist movements that reacted to the social issues of the time and include Garden City, Radiant City, Broadacre, etc. This study sought to present these theoretical considerations with respect to certain development classifications in urban planning. Accordingly, the methodology of the research study comprises the following sections/segments for a better understanding of urban planning at different times:

Pre-History of Urban Planning
Foundational Years
Modernism (Rational Planning)
Post Modernism (Post war suburbia)
Current Era

In short, it is concluded that cities have emerged as a result of conscious decisions. Accordingly, looking into the planning theory requires due consideration of the planning approaches utilized over time. This perceives that planning theory is essentially the study of the decisions made from intuition and that is equally right because planning theory and practice development are in parallel.

References

S. Campbell and S. S. Fainstein, “Introduction: The Structure and Debates of Planning Theory,” in Readings in Planning Theory, 4th ed., S. S. Fainstein and J. DeFilippis, Eds. Cambridge: Wiley-Blackwell, 1996, pp. 1–16.

M. Westin, “The framing of power in communicative planning theory : Analysing the work of John Forester , Patsy Healey and Judith Innes,” vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 132–154, 2022, doi: 10.1177/14730952211043219.

F. Choay, The Modern City: Planning in the 19th Century, 1st ed. New York: George Braziller, 1969.

P. Hall, Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design Since 1880. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2014.

R. Fishman, Urban Utopias in the Twentieth Century: Ebenezer Howard, Frank Lloyd Wright, and Le Corbusier. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1982.

M. Kalantari, S. Z. Shahraki, B. Yaghmaei, S. Ghezelbash, and G. Ladaga, “Unraveling Urban Form and Collision Risk : The Spatial Distribution of Traffic Accidents in Zanjan , Iran,” 2021.

J. 60. Weems, “Jeffersonian Urbanism: Frank Lloyd Wright, Aerial Pattern, and Broadacre City,” Barnstorming Prairies How Aer. Vis. Shaped Midwest, pp. 185–250, 2015.

W. H. Wilson, “The Glory, Destruction, and Meaning of the City Beautiful Movement,” in Readings in Planning Theory, First., S. S. Fainstein and S. Campbell, Eds. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing, 1996, pp. 68–102.

E. R. . Alexander, “‘On Planning, Planning Theories, and Practices: A Critical Reflection.,’” Plan. Theory, vol. 21, no. (2):, pp. 181–211, 2022.

R. Foglesong, “Planning the City Practical,” in Planning the Capitalist City: The Colonial Era to the 1920s, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1986, pp. 199–232.

A. Kumar, S. Vidyarthi, and P. Prakash, City Planning in India, 1947 – 2017. London and New York: Routledge, 2020.

A. Black, “Chicago Area Transportation Study : A Case Study of Rational Planning,” pp. 27–37, 1963.

J. Xue, “A critical realist theory of ideology : Promoting planning as a vanguard of societal transformation,” vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 109–131, 2022, doi: 10.1177/14730952211073330.

M. S. Nawaz and N. J. and M. S. Nawaz, “Call for A Shift in Intellectual Standpoint: From Positivist Rationalism to Adaptive Action,” Power, Profits, Plans Polit. Econ. Hous. Pakistan, 2022.

S. M. Wirka, “The City Social Movement,” in Planning the Twentieth-Century American City, C. Silver and M. C. Sies, Eds. London, 1996, pp. 45–73.

“On Spatial Planning and Marxism : Looking Back , Going Forward,” vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 800–824, 2020, doi: 10.1111/anti.12614.

and F. H. 46. Nawaz, Muhammad Shafaat, “Use Of Urban Design Tools to Shape a Sense of Community Among Residents,” J. Archit. Plan. Res., vol. 39, no. 4, 2022.

and M. S. 47. Nawaz, Muhammad Shafaat, “Immigrant Geography: Ethnic Group of Pakistani Americans in Chicago,” Immigrants Minor., vol. 41, no. 2, 2023.

A. 52. Sen, “Viewpoint: Spatial Ethnography of Devon Avenue, Chicago,” Build. Landscapes, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 3–24, 2021.

J. D. Fairfield, The Mysteries of the Great City: The Politics of Urban Design, 1877-1937. Ohio State University Press, 1993.

G. Cranz, “Urban Parks of the Past and Future,” Project for Public Spaces, 2008.

K. Loughran, “Urban parks and urban problems : An historical perspective on green space development as a cultural fix,” 2018, doi: 10.1177/0042098018763555.

R. Fishman, “The Death and Life of American Regional Planning,” in Reflections on Regionalism, B. Katz, Ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2000, pp. 107–123.

D. Miller and J. Nelles, “Order out of Chaos : The Case for a New Conceptualization of the Cross-Boundary Instruments of American Regionalism,” 2020, doi: 10.1177/1078087418773905.

M. H. 54. Siddique, “The Contribution of Pakistan’s Urban and Regional Planners Towards Global Development,” GMSARN Int. J., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 75–84, 2022.

B. Sanyal, “Planning in Theory and in Practice: Perspectives from Planning the Planning School?,” Plan. Theory Pract., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 251–275, 2007, doi: 10.1080/14649350701355577.

and G. G. 51. Seitanidis, Sokratis, “Hardin’s Legacy as a Need for a ‘Commoning Turn’ in Planning,” 2022.

J. D. Fairfield, “The Political Economy of Suburbanization and the Politics of Space,” in The mysteries of the great city: the politics of urban design, 1877-1937, The Ohio State University Press, 1993, pp. 48–82.

J. D. Fairfield, “From Rapid Transit to City Planning: Social Efficiency and the New Urban Discipline,” in The mysteries of the great city: the politics of urban design, 1877-1937, The Ohio State University Press, 1993, pp. 83–118.

and H. S. H. A. Haroon, Faiza, Muhammad Shafaat Nawaz, Faiqa Khilat, “Urban Heritage of the Walled City Of Lahore: Critical Analysis and the Way Forward for Policy,” J. Archit. Plann. Res., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 289–302.:, 2019.

J. A. Gómez, J. E. Patiño, J. C. Duque, and S. Passos, “Spatiotemporal modeling of urban growth using machine learning,” Remote Sens., vol. 12, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.3390/rs12010109.

E. Kneebone and E. Garr, “The suburbanization of poverty: Trends in metropolitan America, 2000 to 2008,” Washington, DC, 2010.

J. T. Metzger, “Planned abandonment: The neighborhood life-cycle theory and national urban policy,” Hous. Policy Debate, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 7–40, 2000, doi: 10.1080/10511482.2000.9521359.

R. E. Park, “Human Ecology,” in New perspectives on the American community: A Book of Readings, 3rd ed., R. L. Warren, Ed. Chicago, IL, USA: Rand McNally College Pub. Co, 1977, pp. 46–57.

J. D. Fairfield, “An Urban Sociology: Robert E. Park and The Realistic Tradition,” in The mysteries of the great city: the politics of urban design, 1877-1937, The Ohio State University Press, 1993, pp. 159–188.

J. Brody, “The Neighbourhood Unit Concept and the Shaping of Land Planning in the United States 1912-1968,” J. Urban Des., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 340–362, 2013, doi: 10.1080/13574809.2013.800453.

S. Roitman and N. Phelps, “Do gates negate the city? gated communities’ contribution to the urbanisation of suburbia in pilar, Argentina,” Urban Stud., vol. 48, no. 16, pp. 3487–3509, 2011, doi: 10.1177/0042098010397395.

B. R. Benjamin, “The Gated Community Mentality,” The New York Times, Mar. 2012.

C. E. Lindblom, “The Scince of ‘Muddling Through,’” Public Adm. Rev., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 79–88, 1959, doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/973677.

and V. W. Siame, Gilbert, “Co-Production and the Issue of Urban up-Scaling and Governance Change in the Global South: The Case of Uganda,” Plan. Theory, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 269–290, 2022.

K. F. Gotham, “A city without slums: Urban renewal, public housing, and downtown revitalization in Kansas City, Missouri,” Am. J. Econ. Sociol., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 285–316, 2001, doi: 10.1111/1536-7150.00064.

J. Leslie, “The trouble with Megaprojects,” The New Yorker, New York, Apr. 2015.

B. Flyvbjerg, “Introduction: The iron law of megaproject management,” Oxford Handb. megaproject Manag., no. May, pp. 1–18, 2017.

D. Harvey, “Neoliberalism and the restoration of class power,” in Spaces of Global Capitalism, Verso Books, 2005.

J. Peck, N. Theodore, and N. Brenner, “Neoliberal Urbanism: Models, Moments, Mutations,” SAIS Rev. Int. Aff., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 49–66, 2009, doi: 10.1353/sais.0.0028.

D. Harvey, “Flexible Accumulation through Urbaniation: Reflections on ‘Post-modernism’ in the American City,” Antipode, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 260–286, 1987, doi: ttps://doi.org/10.2307/1567167.

T. Stanley, “Urban surveillance,” Int. J. Humanit., vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 117–124, 2006.

S. Silva and P. De Vries, “The trajectory of the right to the city in Recife , Brazil : From belonging towards inclusion,” vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 291–311, 2022, doi: 10.1177/14730952221081761.

L. B. Rubin, “Maximum Feasible Participation: The Origins, Implications, and Present Status,” Poverty Hum. Resour., vol. 2, pp. 14–29, 1967.

C. Basta, “Are Radical and Insurgent Planning (Truly) at Odds with a Nonviolent Conception of Liberal Planning?,” Plan. Theory, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 212–218.

R. Brown, “Rebel with a Plan: Norm Krumholz and ‘Equity Planning’ in Cleveland,” Teach. Clevel., 2015.

M. H. Thulare and I. Moyo, “Systematic Review of Informal Urban Economies,” pp. 1–18, 2021.

N. Banks, M. Lombard, and D. Mitlin, “Urban Informality as a Site of Critical Analysis,” J. Dev. Stud., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 223–238, 2020, doi: 10.1080/00220388.2019.1577384.

D. Harvey, “Class Structure and the Theory of Residential Differentiation,” in The Urban Experience, The John Hopkins University Press, 1989, pp. 109–124.

E. Huq, “Beyond a Liberal Reading of Insurgent in Transformative Planning Practices,” vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 219–223, 2022.

G. Lipsitz, “The Racialization of Space and the Spatialization of Race,” Landsc. J., vol. 26, pp. 10–23, 2007.

I. G. Ellen and S. L. Ross, “Race and the City,” J. Hous. Econ., vol. 40, pp. 1–5, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jhe.2018.05.001.

“Accessibility and Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities in Urban Development,” 2016.

“The 7 Principles of Universal Design,” Cent. Excell. Univers. Des. n.d..

T. Fenster, “The right to the gendered city: Different formations of belonging in everyday life,” J. Gend. Stud., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 217–231, 2005, doi: 10.1080/09589230500264109.

F. Khan, “Your City Has a Gender and It’s Male”.

N. Massaquoi, Queer Theory and Intersectionality, Second Edi., vol. 19. Elsevier, 2015. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.28073-2.

R. Vasudevan and M. N. E, “Pluriversal planning scholarship : Embracing multiplicity and situated knowledges in community-based approaches,” 2021, doi: 10.1177/14730952211000384.

B. Campkin, “Intersections: Going Out Queer, New Urban Agendas,” Urban Omnibus, 2018.

J. J. Betancur and J. L. Smith, “Selling the Neighborhood: Commodification versus Differential Space,” in Claiming Neighborhood: New Ways of Understanding Urban Change, Chicago, IL, USA: University of Illinois Press, 2016, pp. 123–149. doi: 10.5406/illinois/9780252040504.001.0001.

P. Healey, “Planning Through Debate: The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory,” in Readings in Planning Theory, Second., S. S. Fainstein and J. DeFilippis, Eds. New Jersey: Wiley, 2003.

S. R. Arnstein, “A Ladder Of Citizen Participation,” J. Am. Inst. Plann., vol. 35, no. 4, p. 216 — 224, 1969, doi: 10.1080/01944366908977225.

Y. Beebeejaun, “Provincializing planning: Reflections on spatial ordering and imperial power,” Plan. Theory, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 248–268, 2022, doi: 10.1177/14730952211026697.

J. Forester, The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. UCL Press, 1993.

W. Salet, “The Construction of Legality in Everyday Practices of Planning,” Plan. Theory, p. 147309522110035, 2021, doi: 10.1177/14730952211003535.

J. A. Throgmorton, “Planning as Persuasive Storytelling About the Future: Negotiating an Electric Power Rate Settlement in Illinois,” J. Plan. Educ. Res., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 17–31, 1992, doi: 10.1177/0739456X9201200103.

S. van Londen and A. de Ruijter, “Sustainable Diversity,” in The Sustainability of Cultural Diversity: Nations, Cities and Organizations, M. Janssens, M. Bechtoldt, and G. Prarolo, Eds. Edward Elgar Publishing, Incorporated, 2010, pp. 3–31.

S. Campbell, “Green Cities, Growing Cities, Just Cities?: Urban Planning and the Contradictions of Sustainable Development,” in Readings in Planning Theory: Fourth Edition, S. S. Fainstein and J. Defilippis, Eds. 2016, pp. 214–240. doi: 10.1002/9781119084679.ch11.

S. Campbell, “Sustainable Development and Social Justice: Conflicting Urgencies and the Search for Common Ground in Urban and Regional Planning,” Michigan J. Sustain., vol. 1, no. Fall 2013, pp. 75–91, 2013, doi: 10.3998/mjs.12333712.0001.007.

M. S. Nawaz and S. Akbar, “Is Lahore’s urban system ready to sustain climate change? The case in Pakistan,” Eur. J. Clim. Chang., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 22–32, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.34154/2020-EJCC-0202-22-32/euraass.

Ş. Yıldız, “Planning a ‘Regional breathing space’: the ecological shift in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the New Jersey Meadowlands, 1970,” Plan. Perspect., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 95–123, 2021, doi: 10.1080/02665433.2019.1709099.

F. Nourian, M. Alipour, and P. Ache, “Model-theory interaction in urban planning: A critical review,” Plan. Theory, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 229–247, 2022, doi: 10.1177/14730952211026693.

C. Ellis, “The New Urbanism: Critiques and Rebuttals,” J. Urban Des., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 261–291, 2002, doi: 10.1080/1357480022000039330.

C. Wang, “Do Planning Concepts Matter? A Lacanian Interpretation of the Urban Village in a British Context,” Plan. Theory, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 155–180, 2022.

A. Aziz, M. S. Nawaz, M. Nadeem, and L. Afzal, “Examining suitability of the integrated public transport system : A case study of Lahore,” Transp. Res. Part A, vol. 117, no. March, pp. 13–25, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.003.

J. J. Betancur, “History and Theory of Urban Planning and Policy,” in Handbook on Transport and Urban Planning in the Developed World, M. C. J. Blieme, C. Mulley, and C. J. Moutou, Eds. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016, pp. 15–36. doi: 10.4337/9781783471393.

B. Flyvbjerg, “Rationality and Power,” in Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice, Chicago, IL, USA: The University of Chicago Press, 1998, pp. 318–329.

S. Y. Kim et al., “Updating the Institutional Collective Action Framework,” Policy Stud. J., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–26, 2020, doi: 10.1111/psj.12392.

M. Foucault, “Truth and Power,” in Power/Knowledge, C. Gordon, Ed. New York: Pantheon Books, 1977, pp. 109–133. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_438.

K. E. Larsen, “Review essay: Divergent views on the birth of city planning,” J. Urban Hist., vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 864–872, 2007, doi: 10.1177/0096144207301339.

J. Fairfield, Mysteries of the Great City: The Politics of Urban Design, 1877-1937. Ohio: Ohio State University Press, 1993.

P. Allmendinger and M. Gunder, “Applying lacanian insight and a dash of derridean deconstruction to planning’s ‘dark side,’” Plan. Theory, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 87–112, 2005, doi: 10.1177/1473095205051444.

R. Sennett, “Moving Bodies Harvey’s Revolution,” in Flesh and Stone: The Body and the City in Western Civilization, 1st ed., New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1996, pp. 255–353.

R. Hameed, M. Javed, and M. S. Nawaz, “An assessment of adoption of rainwater harvesting system in residential buildings in Lahore, Pakistan,” Urban Water J., pp. 1–10, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1080/1573062X.2020.1860239.

L. Mayer and L. A. Nguyen Long, “Can city-to-city cooperation facilitate sustainable development governance in the Global South? Lessons gleaned from seven North-South partnerships in Latin America,” Int. J. Urban Sustain. Dev., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 174–186, 2021, doi: 10.1080/19463138.2020.1855433.

L. Anh, N. Long, and R. M. Krause, “Managing policy-making in the local climate governance landscape : The role of network administrative organizations and member cities,” no. November 2019, pp. 23–39, 2021, doi: 10.1111/padm.12684.