Generative AI Ethical Challenges: By Creative and Professional Communities
Keywords:
Generative AI, Ethics, Authorship, Creativity, RegulationAbstract
This Paper investigates the ethical transformations and creative dilemmas emerging from the widespread adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in content creation. The study examines attitudes regarding authorship, ethical issues, and regulatory rules by conducting interviews with 120 GenAI users from academic, creative, and professional fields. Results show that most participants prefer to give credit to co-authors or themselves when using GenAI and only a small percentage want the AI to have sole authorship. Concerns over ethics are moderate and almost always present, reaching their highest-level concerning liability (3.12), then labeling (3.00), and then bias (2.98) on a 5-point scale. Although individuals frequently used GenAI tools, there was no clear link between the amount of GenAI they used and their sensitivity to ethics. People working in creative fields were more likely than technologists to back stronger government oversight. Users notice GenAI’s ability to generate fresh ideas, though they also have doubts about its accountability, the roles it plays in knowledge, and its ability to replace human creativity. It ends by urging the development of strategies and education focused on ethical principles, ensuring that technology serves society.
References
M. B. Garcia, “The Paradox of Artificial Creativity: Challenges and Opportunities of Generative AI Artistry,” Creat. Res. J., May 2024, doi: 10.1080/10400419.2024.2354622;PAGE:STRING:ARTICLE/CHAPTER.
S. Sedkaoui and R. Benaichouba, “Generative AI as a transformative force for innovation: a review of opportunities, applications and challenges,” Eur. J. Innov. Manag., vol. ahead-of-print, no. ahead-of-print, 2024, doi: 10.1108/EJIM-02-2024-0129/FULL/XML.
C. Xu, Y. Sun, and H. Zhou, “Artificial Aesthetics and Ethical Ambiguity: Exploring Business Ethics in the Context of AI-driven Creativity,” J. Bus. Ethics, pp. 1–22, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1007/S10551-024-05837-2/METRICS.
M. Zohny, H., McMillan, J., & King, “Ethics of generative AI,” J. Med. Ethics, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 79–80, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2023-108909.
Soroush Sabbaghan & Sarah Elaine Eaton, “Navigating the Ethical Frontier: Graduate Students’ Experiences with Generative AI-Mediated Scholarship,” Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-024-00454-6.
N. B. Florent Vinchon, Todd Lubart, Sabrina Bartolotta, Valentin Gironnay, Marion Botella, Samira Bourgeois-Bougrine, Jean-Marie Burkhardt, “Artificial Intelligence & Creativity: A Manifesto for Collaboration,” J. Creat. Behav., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 472–484, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jocb.597
Luke Tredinnick and Claire Laybats, “Black-box creativity and generative artifical intelligence,” Sage Journals, vol. 40, no. 3, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382123119513.
O. P. H. Anil R. Doshi, “Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content,” Sci. Adv., vol. 10, no. 28, 2024, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adn5290.
A. Deck, “Surveying impacts of AI in education and creative practices. In J. A. Cordeiro, D. Aveiro, & B. Shishkov (Eds.),” Proc. 15th Int. Jt. Conf. Knowl. Discov. Knowl. Eng. Knowl. Manag., pp. 400–412, 2023.
Chaoran Wang, “Exploring Students’ Generative AI-Assisted Writing Processes: Perceptions and Experiences from Native and Nonnative English Speakers,” Technol. Knowl. Learn., 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09744-3.
A. A. A. Q. Al-Mothana M. Gasaymeh, Mohammad A. Beirat, “University Students’ Insights of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Writing Tools,” Educ. Sci, vol. 14, no. 10, p. 1062, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101062.
M. M. Kuldeep Singh, Sheshadri Chatterjee, “Applications of generative AI and future organizational performance: The mediating role of explorative and exploitative innovation and the moderating role of ethical dilemmas and environmental dynamism,” Technovation, vol. 133, p. 103021, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103021.
R. S. Nasr and S. El-Deeb, “Generative AI and Its Potential Impact on Humanity,” Int. J. Consum. Stud., vol. 49, no. 1, p. e70024, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1111/IJCS.70024.
A. da Veiga, “Ethical guidelines for the use of generative artificial intelligence and artificial intelligence-assisted tools in scholarly publishing: a thematic analysis,” Sci. Ed., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 28–34, 2025, doi: 10.6087/KCSE.352.
Y.-S. Wang, N., Wang, X., & Su, “Critical analysis of the technological affordances, challenges and future directions of generative AI in education: A systematic review,” Asia Pacific J. Educ., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 139–155, 2024.
C. L. R. Mortlock, “Generative artificial intelligence (Gen-AI) in pharmacy education: Utilization and implications for academic integrity: A scoping review,” Explor. Res. Clin. Soc. Pharm., vol. 15, p. 100481, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000787?via%3Dihub
L. S. Maha Inam, Sana Sheikh, Abdul Mannan Khan Minhas, Elizabeth M. Vaughan c, Chayakrit Krittanawong, Zainab Samad, Carl J. Lavie, Adeel Khoja, Melaine D’Cruze, “A review of top cardiology and cardiovascular medicine journal guidelines regarding the use of generative artificial intelligence tools in scientific writing,” Curr. Probl. Cardiol., vol. 49, no. 3, p. 102387, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0146280624000264?via%3Dihub
M. M. Asad and A. Ajaz, “Impact of ChatGPT and generative AI on lifelong learning and upskilling learners in higher education: unveiling the challenges and opportunities globally,” Int. J. Inf. Learn. Technol., vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 507–523, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1108/IJILT-06-2024-0103/FULL/XML.
F. S. Sergio E. Uribe, Ilze Maldupa, “Integrating Generative AI in Dental Education: A Scoping Review of Current Practices and Recommendations,” Eur. J. Dent. Educ., 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.13074.
Miranda Olff, “Celebrando 15 años de Psicotraumatología – ¿un futuro con IA generativa?,” Eur. J. Psychotraumatol., vol. 15, no. 1, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2024.2429921.
K. Daniel, M. M. Msambwa, and Z. Wen, “Can Generative AI Revolutionise Academic Skills Development in Higher Education? A Systematic Literature Review,” Eur. J. Educ., vol. 60, no. 1, p. e70036, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1111/EJED.70036;JOURNAL:JOURNAL:14653435;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION.
M. M. & J. Y. Guido Schryen, “Exploring the scope of generative AI in literature review development,” Electron. Mark., vol. 35, no. 13, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12525-025-00754-2
A. Erler, “Publish with AUTOGEN or Perish? Some Pitfalls to Avoid in the Pursuit of Academic Enhancement via Personalized Large Language Models,” Am. J. Bioeth., vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 94–96, 2023, doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2250291/ASSET//CMS/ASSET/E8AD109C-5F0D-49EC-8E69-92230D04BAB0/15265161.2023.2250291.FP.PNG.
Hazem Zohny, “Reimagining Scholarship: A Response to the Ethical Concerns of AUTOGEN,” Am. J. Bioeth., vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 96–99, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15265161.2023.2250315
V. A. Humaid Al Naqbi, Zied Bahroun, “Enhancing Work Productivity through Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Comprehensive Literature Review,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 3, p. 1166, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031166.
G. C. João Batista, Anabela Mesquita, “Generative AI and Higher Education: Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions from a Systematic Literature Review,” Information, vol. 15, no. 11, p. 676, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/info15110676.
A. M. Fouad, I. E. Salem, and E. A. Fathy, “Generative AI insights in tourism and hospitality: A comprehensive review and strategic research roadmap,” Tour. Hosp. Res., 2024, doi: 10.1177/14673584241293125;PAGEGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION.
M. K. L. Casey Watters, “Universal skepticism of ChatGPT: a review of early literature on chat generative pre-trained transformer,” Front. Big Data, vol. 6, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2023.1224976.
S. Shaikh, Z. A., & Dutta, “AI-generated authorship and the ethics of semi-autonomous creativity,” AI Ethics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 33–48, 2024.
M. M. Günther, M., Hoffmann, C., & Maas, “From human to hybrid authorship: Reconsidering IP law in the era of generative AI,” J. Intellect. Prop. Law Pract., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 22–33, 2024.
M. Chen, Y., Zhang, J., & Liu, “Ethical tensions in AI-assisted academic writing: A survey of student perspectives,” AI Ethics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 123–140, 2024.
N. Trabelsi, A., Abbas, A., & Ben Abdallah, “Ethical risks and epistemic opacity in large language models,” AI Soc., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 278–292, 2024.
N. Farooq, R., & Syed, “Displacement and creativity: The impact of generative AI on digital content professionals,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 196, p. 122014, 2025.
T. Wang, S., Al-Zahrani, M., & Papadopoulos, “Bias and misinformation in AI-generated content: Quantifying user risk in generative journalism,” Inf. Process. Manag., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 103211, 2025.
S. Oliveira, P., & Tang, “Human-AI co-creation and emotional resonance: Evaluating prolonged user engagement,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 151, p. 107160, 2024.
A. Rana, T., & Rehman, “Generative AI and the ethics of learning: Perspectives from higher education,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 79–98, 2024.
S. Saini, R., & Bhattacharya, “Policy dilemmas in regulating generative AI: A multilateral approach,” Technol. Soc., vol. 78, p. 102364, 2024.

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 50sea

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.