Geospatial Analysis of Land Fragmentation and Its Impact on Land Use of District Peshawar, Pakistan

Tabassum Naz Khalil; Atta ur Rehman; Uzma; Fahima Marwat

Authors

Tabassum Naz Khalil Peshawar university
Atta ur Rehman Department of Geography and Geomatics University of Peshawar
Uzma Department of Geography and Geomatics University of Peshawar
Fahima Marwat Department of Geography and Geomatics University of Peshawar

Keywords:

Land Fragmentation, Land Use, Land fragmentation Revenue, Cultivated Land

Abstract

The study analyzes how land fragmentation affects the use of the land in sample villages of Peshawar district. Globally, land is a primary source of productivity, yet the population is expanding at an alarming rate. This population growth has an effect on how land is acquired and used, which frequently results in the problem of land fragmentation. To meet the study's goals, data were gathered from both primary and secondary sources including an intensive field survey using a questionnaire as well as land revenue department and population census organization. Out of a total of 279 villages two sample villages, namely village Ghalji Kander Khel and village Mathra were selected by random means for detailed and intensive study. During 1990-91 to 2020-21, fragmented land in sample villages increased. In village Ghalji Kander Khel fragmented land increased from 5.6% in 1990-91 to 23.9% in 2020-21 while in village Mathra fragmented land increased from 6.9% in 1990-91 to 27.1% in 2020-21 indicating an overall four-time increase during past two decades. The main cause of land fragmentation in sample villages is the Law of Inheritance, followed by population growth, market prices, financial difficulties, social issues, and government infrastructure. In sample villages, both area under cultivation and cultivable waste decreased out of which in village Ghalji Kander Khel cultivated land shrunk from 3478 kanal (1 kanal =506 m²) to 2194.1kanals and cultivable waste reduced from 31.1 to 25.4 kanal from 1990-91 to 2020-21. In village Mathra, cultivated land contracted from 5473.2 kanal in 1990-91 to 3443.94 kanal in 2020-21, and cultivable waste diminished from 117.81 kanal to 32.4 kanal. The built-up area enlarged from 802.4 kanal to 1298.1 kanal in Ghalji Kander Khel and from 1392.3 kanal to 1991.6 kanal in Mathra. Finally, it was revealed that most of the area under cultivation is transformed into other land uses. The conversion of cultivable waste to cultivable land took place on a very small scale.

References

T. Q. Tran and H. Van Vu, “Land fragmentation and household income: First evidence from rural Vietnam,” Land use policy, vol. 89, p. 104247, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2019.104247.

T. van Dijk, “Scenarios of Central European land fragmentation,” Land use policy, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 149–158, Apr. 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0264-8377(02)00082-0.

Y. Jiang, Y. T. Tang, H. Long, and W. Deng, “Land consolidation: A comparative research between Europe and China,” Land use policy, vol. 112, p. 105790, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2021.105790.

J. Liu et al., “Influential factors and classification of cultivated land fragmentation, and implications for future land consolidation: A case study of Jiangsu Province in eastern China,” Land use policy, vol. 88, p. 104185, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2019.104185.

R. Kousar, M. S. A. Makhdum, R. Ullah, A. Saghir, S. Usman, and T. Sadaf, “Empirical investigation of impact of land fragmentation on crop productivity in Punjab, Pakistan,” Sarhad J. Agric., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 217–223, 2020, doi: 10.17582/JOURNAL.SJA/2020/36.1.217.223.

L. Latruffe and L. Piet, “Does land fragmentation affect farm performance? A case study from Brittany, France,” Agric. Syst., vol. 129, pp. 68–80, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1016/J.AGSY.2014.05.005.

O. L. Balogun and B. E. Akinyemi, “Land fragmentation effects on technical efficiency of cassava farmers in South-West geopolitical zone, Nigeria,” http://www.editorialmanager.com/cogentsocsci, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 1387983, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1080/23311886.2017.1387983.

R. S. de Groot, R. Alkemade, L. Braat, L. Hein, and L. Willemen, “Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making,” Ecol. Complex., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 260–272, Sep. 2010, doi: 10.1016/J.ECOCOM.2009.10.006.

V. Gitz and A. Meybeck, “Risks, vulnerabilities and resilience in a context of climate change”.

Y. Li, Z. Cao, H. Long, Y. Liu, and W. Li, “Dynamic analysis of ecological environment combined with land cover and NDVI changes and implications for sustainable urban–rural development: The case of Mu Us Sandy Land, China,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 142, pp. 697–715, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.09.011.

M. Sajid et al., “IMPACT OF LAND-USE CHANGE ON AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION & ACCURACY ASSESSMENT THROUGH CONFUSION MATRIX,” Pak. J. Sci., vol. 74, no. 4, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.57041/PJS.V74I4.793.

D. Demetriou, J. Stillwell, and L. See, “A new methodology for measuring land fragmentation,” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst., vol. 39, pp. 71–80, May 2013, doi: 10.1016/J.COMPENVURBSYS.2013.02.001.

J. D. Sachs, G. Schmidt-Traub, M. Mazzucato, D. Messner, N. Nakicenovic, and J. Rockström, “Six Transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals,” Nat. Sustain. 2019 29, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 805–814, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9.

Y. Liu, F. Fang, and Y. Li, “Key issues of land use in China and implications for policy making,” Land use policy, vol. 40, pp. 6–12, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2013.03.013.

P. Van Hung, T. G. Macaulay, and S. P. Marsh, “The economics of land fragmentation in the north of Vietnam*,” Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 195–211, Jun. 2007, doi: 10.1111/J.1467-8489.2007.00378.X.

S. Tan, N. Heerink, and F. Qu, “Land fragmentation and its driving forces in China,” Land use policy, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 272–285, Jul. 2006, doi: 10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2004.12.001.

G. S. Niroula and G. B. Thapa, “Impacts of land fragmentation on input use, crop yield and production efficiency in the mountains of Nepal,” L. Degrad. Dev., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 237–248, May 2007, doi: 10.1002/LDR.771.

H. Mäkinen and H. Mäkinen, “Farmers’ managerial thinking and management process effectiveness as factors of financial success on Finnish dairy farms,” Agric. Food Sci., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 452–465, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.23986/AFSCI.8147.

S. Su, Y. Hu, F. Luo, G. Mai, and Y. Wang, “Farmland fragmentation due to anthropogenic activity in rapidly developing region,” Agric. Syst., vol. 131, pp. 87–93, Nov. 2014, doi: 10.1016/J.AGSY.2014.08.005.

B. N. Dhakal and N. R. Khanal, “Causes and Consequences of Fragmentation of Agricultural Land: A Case of Nawalparasi District, Nepal,” Geogr. J. Nepal, vol. 11, pp. 95–112, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.3126/GJN.V11I0.19551.

J. Janus and E. Ertunç, “Differences in the effectiveness of land consolidation projects in various countries and their causes: Examples of Poland and Turkey,” Land use policy, vol. 108, p. 105542, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2021.105542.

T. Sikor, D. Müller, and J. Stahl, “Land Fragmentation and Cropland Abandonment in Albania: Implications for the Roles of State and Community in Post-Socialist Land Consolidation,” World Dev., vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1411–1423, Aug. 2009, doi: 10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2008.08.013.

M. Atasoy, “Monitoring the urban green spaces and landscape fragmentation using remote sensing: a case study in Osmaniye, Turkey,” Environ. Monit. Assess., vol. 190, no. 12, pp. 1–8, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1007/S10661-018-7109-1/METRICS.

Z. Wu, R. Chen, M. E. Meadows, D. Sengupta, and D. Xu, “Changing urban green spaces in Shanghai: trends, drivers and policy implications,” Land use policy, vol. 87, p. 104080, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2019.104080.