Qubits - Shaping the Future of Information Processing
Keywords:
Quantum Bits, Superposition and Entanglement, Quantum circuits, Performance of Quantum ComputersAbstract
In the endless striving to push the boundaries of information processing capabilities, the competition that rages today between Quantum Bits and Classical Bits has become the central area of interest in modern research. The research elucidates and analyzes the distinct characteristics of these two fundamental units of information. It also critically examines their prospective futures in computing. In this article, a comprehensive comparison between Classical Bits - the binary entities that constituted classical computing for decades - and quantum bits - quantum mechanical counterparts that realize the principles of superposition and entanglement - is given. The research is based on the fundamental principles of classical and quantum computers, information units, logic circuits, time scaling dissimilarities, and complexity of algorithms. This article fills this gap by providing a comprehensive and structured comparative analysis of Classical Bits and quantum bits, examining their foundational principles, logic circuit realizations, algorithmic complexity, and computational scalability. The study offers a consolidated perspective that helps clarify the fundamental differences and practical implications of classical versus quantum computation, thereby supporting researchers and practitioners in understanding the computational advantages and limitations of both paradigms. Key observations include: The world has witnessed that classical computers have emerged vastly over the decades, in terms of memory sizes and computing speeds. For this reason, classical computers are used in nearly all fields. Nevertheless, in many fields, classical computers are less effective in solving complex problems in terms of accuracy, speed, and efficiency. Therefore, research exploring the exceptional features - entanglement and superposition - of qubits or Quantum Bits explores how quantum phenomena give rise to new modalities in computing.
References
S. P. Kulkarni, D. E. Huang, and E. W. Bethel, “From Bits to Qubits: Challenges in Classical-Quantum Integration,” Jan. 2025, Accessed: Jan. 28, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2501.18905
O. Regev, “An Efficient Quantum Factoring Algorithm,” J. ACM, vol. 72, no. 1, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1145/3708471.
Loïc Maréchal, “Investment Trends in Quantum Computing,” Quantum Technol., 2026, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/398244830_Investment_Trends_in_Quantum_Computing
Liam Doyle, Fargol Seifollahi, “Do we have a quantum computer? Expert perspectives on current state and future prospects,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res, 2026, [Online]. Available: https://journals.aps.org/prper/abstract/10.1103/md6x-pfrr
Kanamori & Yoo, “Quantum Computing: Principles and Applications,” J. Int. Technol. Inf. Manag., vol. 29, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1410&context=jitim
Christopher Columbus Chinnappan, Palani Thanaraj Krishnan, Elakiya Elamaran, Rajakumar Arul, T. Sunil Kumar, “Quantum Computing: Foundations, Architecture and Applications,” Eng. Reports, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eng2.70337
S. Karthikeyan, M. Akila, D. Sumathi, and T. Poongodi, “Quantum machine learning: A modern approach,” Quantum Mach. Learn. A Mod. Approach, pp. 1–300, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1201/9781003429654/Quantum-Machine-Learning-Karthikeyan-Akila-Sumathi-Poongodi/Rights-And-Permissions.
H. A. Bhat, F. A. Khanday, B. K. Kaushik, F. Bashir, and K. A. Shah, “Quantum Computing: Fundamentals, Implementations and Applications,” IEEE Open J. Nanotechnol., vol. 3, pp. 61–77, 2022, doi: 10.1109/OJNANO.2022.3178545.
K. S. Vasantrao and A. Saxena, “Bits to Qubits: An Overview of Quantum Computing,” 2025 Int. Conf. Intell. Control. Comput. Commun. IC3 2025, pp. 120–124, 2025, doi: 10.1109/IC363308.2025.10956309.
J. Bley et al., “Visualizing entanglement in multiqubit systems,” Phys. Rev. Res., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 023077, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1103/PHYSREVRESEARCH.6.023077/FIGURES/8/MEDIUM.
B. Rodenburg, “Estimating the Power of a Quantum Computer,” Jan. 2025, Accessed: Jan. 28, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.00113
B. Just, “Quantum Gates on One Qubit,” Quantum Comput. Compact, pp. 69–82, 2022, doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-65008-0_9.
Shawn Knight, “IBM aims to double quantum computing speed yearly | TechSpot,” TECHSPOT.
Torsten Hoefler, Thomas Haener, Matthias Troyer, “Disentangling Hype from Practicality: On Realistically Achieving Quantum Advantage,” arXiv:2307.00523, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.00523
“Quantum Computing Memory And Storage.” Accessed: Feb. 08, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.forbes.com/sites/tomcoughlin/2021/09/28/quantum-computing-memory-and-storage/
N. Thompson, C. Dukatz, P. P. Shukla, and S. Choi, “Practical quantum computing is about more than just hardware,” California Management Review, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://cmr.berkeley.edu/2024/03/practical-quantum-computing-is-about-more-than-just-hardware/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 50sea

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


















